Llm inference on cpu reddit. I have an old CPU + 4090 and run llama 32B 4bit.


  1. Home
    1. Llm inference on cpu reddit The key is being able to use other programs like web browsers with the LLM running in the background. . Decent inference speed. GPT4All does not have a mobile app. Run inference tests with a tiny prompt like "tell me a joke" and a fixed seed to always get the same output, to make the results comparable. I operate on a very tight budget and found that you can get away with very little if you do your homework. You can find our simple tutorial at Medium: How to Use LLMs in Unity. Or check it out in the app stores In this paper, we propose Fiddler, a resource-efficient inference engine with CPU-GPU orchestration for MoE models. Can you guys give me any suggestions? Share Add a Comment. txt | train > my-model. cpp seems like it can use both CPU and GPU, but I haven't quite figured that out yet. I have used this 5. The rapid growth of LLMs has revolutionized natural language processing and AI analysis, but their increasing size and memory demands present significant challenges. After completing the build I decided to compare the performance of LLM inference on both systems (I mean the inference on the CPU). CPU: Ryzen 3200g Ram: 3200 MHz 8 GB (2x) GPU: RX 580 8 GB I know its not much, and my goal isn’t running 34/70B models or anything, I just want to see how local LLMs within these specs perform. You can run a model across more than 1 machine. The challenge is we don’t easily have a GPU avail for inferences, so I was thinking of training the model on a GPU then deploying it to constantly do predictions on a server that only has a CPU. cpp using 4-bit quantized Llama 3. OpenAI had figured out they couldn't manage in sense of performance 2T model splitted on several gpus, so they invented GPT-4 moe I am considering upgrading the CPU instead of the GPU since it is a more cost-effective option and will allow me to run larger models. When I need to run something really big, I use the CPU memory. I did some research and tried the following open text-to-speech solutions: Piper TTS: it's very fast on CPU. , local PC with iGPU, discrete GPU such as Arc, Flex and Max). I will probably need it for a project I am currently playing around and if I get lucky I will get to write my dr. Please keep the improvements coming. So that's why there are so many cores on newer CPUs. CPU: Since the GPU will be the highest priority for LLM inference, how crucial is the CPU? I'm considering an Intel socket 1700 for future upgradability. Or check it out in the app stores Accelerate local LLM inference and finetuning on Intel CPU and GPU (e. A Steam Deck is just such an AMD APU. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Discussion Hi, I have been playing with local llms in a very old laptop (2015 intel haswell model) using cpu inference so far. The inference speed is acceptable, but not great. For very short content lengths, I got almost 10tps (tokens per second), which shrinks down to a little over 1. It allows to run Llama 2 70B on 8 x Raspberry Pi 4B 4. EFFICIENCY ALERT: Some papers and approaches in the last few months which reduces pretraining and/or fintuning and/or inference costs generally or for specific use cases. One thing that's important to remember about fast CPU/RAM is that if you're doing other things besides just LLM inference, fast RAM and CPU can be more important than VRAM in those Hey all! Recently, I've been wanting to play around with Mamba, the LLM architecture that relies on state space model instead of transformers. I'm curious about your experience with 2x3090. iGPU + 4090 the CPU + 4090 would be way better. You can also get marginal results tweeting your ram and CPU overclock on the bios. e. - It can perform up to 5x faster than existing systems like Guidance and vLLM on common LLM workloads. Its actually a pretty old project but hasn't gotten much attention. ONNX is indeed a bit falling behind when it comes to LLM quantization, which is quite different from previous tech like Per-tensor/Per-channel for both weight and activation. Being able to actually compute fast enough to keep up with this is important too, but usually the bottleneck is RAM bandwidth. You will actually run things on a dedicated GPU primarily. A PyTorch library that integrates with llama. I have an old CPU + 4090 and run llama 32B 4bit. As soon as you can't your options are a smaller model or quant or switch to gguf with cpu offloading. Just for the sake of it I wanna check the performance on CPU. m5. Most of the performant inference solutions are based on CUDA and optimized for NVIDIA GPUs. Ease of Integration and Use: Compatible with popular LLMs and designed for easy local deployment. 13B would be faster, but I'd rather wait a little longer for a bigger model's better response than waste time regenerating subpar replies. upvotes Intel LLM Runtime(Fastest CPU only inference(?)): https: The community for Old School RuneScape discussion on Reddit. So, I was looking into buying a machine with an i5 CPU + RTX 4070 TI SUPER at first, and after read some articles here, I've lost my way. For an extreme example, how would a high-end i9-14900KF (24 threads, up to 6 GHz, ~$550) compare to a low-end i3-14100 (4 threads, up to 4. I wanted a voice that sounds a bit hilarious with a British accent. cpp running on my cpu (on virtualized Linux) and also this browser open with 12. However, they are associated with high expenses, making LLMs for large-scale utilization inaccessible to many. GPU Utilization: Monitor the GPU utilization during inference. For inference it's pretty much a memory bandwidth game at this point. When running LLM inference by offloading some layers to the CPU, Windows assigns both performance and efficiency cores for the task. 3/16GB free. If I give it a model that is 5 GB large, it can be passed through the CPU 6 times each second. It really depends on how you're using it. When it comes to training we need something like 4-5 the VRAM that the model would normally need to run Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have tried this with M-Lock on and off, it seems not to make any difference. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; CPU: Intel i7 6950x Memory: 8x16gb (128gb) 3200mhz Although my primary intended use case for this rig is LLM Locality-Centric Design: Utilizes the concept of 'hot' and 'cold' neurons for efficient and fast LLM inference. Download a model which can be run in CPU model like a ggml model or a model in the Hugging Face format (for example "llama-7b-hf"). discrete GPU such as Arc, Flex and Max). CPU inference can use all your ram but runs at a slow pace, GPU inference requires a ton of expensive GPUs for 70B (which need over 70 GB of VRAM even at 8 bit quantization). Private LLM has proper sliding window attention for Hello everyone I am building my first small llm workstation. And CPU-only servers with plenty of RAM and beefy CPUs are much, much cheaper than anything with a GPU. 94GB version of fine-tuned Mistral 7B and Optimize your workflows for CPU inference; Consider the trade-offs between model size, performance, and resource requirements; Stay updated with the latest developments in local LLM deployment, as this field is rapidly evolving This time I've tried inference via LM Studio/llama. LLMs are driving major advances in research and development today. 83 tokens/s on LLama-70B, using Q4_K_M. Now, I am looking for a build that can complement the 3090 for my LLM workloads. This library efficiently loads LLMs in GGUF format into CPU or GPU memory, utilizing a CUDA backend for enhanced processing speed. Looking for suggestion on hardware if my goal is to do inferences of 30b models and larger. So I had no experience with multi node multi gpu, but far as I know, if you’re playing LLM with huggingface, you can look at the device_map or TGI (text generation inference) or torchrun’s MP/nproc from llama2 github. At 2 cores, it's a bit slower. Be the first to Yep latency really doesn't matter all that much compared to bandwidth for LLM inference, although I will say don't go for absurdly loose memory timings either as that can reduce effective memory bandwidth So i will have 25 500 Bytes per second. It's possible to use both GPU and CPU but I found that the performance degradation is massive to the point where pure CPU inference is competitive. ) I don't think you should do cpu+gpu hybrid inference No that's not correct, these models a very processor intensive, a GPU is 10x more effective. This contention will inevitably drive down your inference performance. that way channels aren't shared if you're running inference on CPU. Exl2 is great if you can fit the model and context fully in ram. LLM inference doesn't really benefit from cache improvements on their own. Or check it out in the app stores (LLM) that can run on a CPU, I experimented with Mistral-7b, but it proved to be quite slow. Mobo is z690. I havent tried it in awhile, but you should check it out. Or check it out in the app stores rustformers/llm: Run inference for Large Language Models on CPU, with Rust 🦀🚀🦙 r/AITechTips LLaMA-rs: Run inference of LLaMA on CPU with Rust 🦀🦙 github. GPU remains the top choice as of now for running LLMs locally due to its speed and parallel processing capabilities. Does anyone here has AMD Zen 4 CPU? Ideally 7950x. Since memory speed is the real limiter, it won't be much different than CPU inference on the same machine. If you run inference on CPU or mixed between CPU and GPU (using llama. The CPU and RAM don't matter much if you plan to offload entirely to gpu for inference, and neither does PCIe bandwidth, for the most part. CPUs -1. How you proceed depends on your budget. cpp. So you don't need to buy a 3 CPU machine. For fast inference, the nVidia GeForce RTX3090 & 4090 are sort of must have when Inference on (modern) GPU is about one magnitude faster than with CPU (llama 65b: 15 t/s vs 2 t/s). 16/hour on Increase the inference speed of LLM by using multiple devices. So, go with CPU only, or GPU only. 3. This is the first time for me to run the 70b model, so I'm still exploring the possibilities. 0. Also, I couldn't get it to work with Vulkan. Inference isn't as computationally intense as training because you're only doing half of the training loop, but if you're doing inference on a huge network like a 7 billion parameter LLM, then you want a GPU to get things done in a reasonable time frame. Inference is able to leverage those cores. If you have a Xeon CPU then you can take advantage of Intel AMX which is 8-16x faster than AVX-512 for AI workloads. I have an 8gb gpu (3070), and wanted to run both SD and an LLM as part of a web-stack. Suitable for models with large parameters like Lama3 and Phi3. Llama. Usually when doing CPU inference though [especially with modern CPUs with AVX-512 and sometimes even native bfloat16 support] the bottleneck is the memory bandwidth versus the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If you have CUDA, can fit the entire model into GPU VRAM and don't mind 4bit then exllama will be 3-4x faster. Rather, there's a lot of math that needs to happen. Like 30b/65b vicuña or Alpaca. 2. But those will cost you a lot more than a comparable Mac. Pair these with high-bandwidth memory (HBM), and you have a setup designed to run LLM everywhere! The icing on the cake? MLC-LLM's Vulkan backend was actually suprisingly fast on my 4900HS (which is similar to your 5800H). For example using a LLM with your documents in a database or vector db gives better results than training the LLM on the same For instance, I came across the MPT-30b model, which is extremely powerful and even has a 4-bit quantization that can run on a CPU. LLMUnity can be installed as a regular Unity package (instructions). That's say that there are many ways to run CPU inference, the most painless way is using llama. cpp BUT prompt processing is really inconsistent and I don't know how to see the two times separately. KV Cache is huge and bottlenecks LLM inference. It also shows the tok/s metric at the bottom of the chat dialog. Details in comments. it'll be slower, but as far as I know the output will be the same That's why they're great at LLM inference and why they're inherently nondeterministic. It will do a lot of the computations in parallel which saves a lot of time. 24/7 inference ( RAG ) Request per hour will go up in the future, now quite low ( < 100 req / hour ) NO training ( At least for now, RAG only seems to be OK ) Prefer up to 16K context length NO preference to exact LLM ( Mistral, LLama, etc. and the ram is upgradable, you could try running 70b on cpu as long as the cpu is good enough, there will be a ram bandwidth cap of 1t/s, but you can cache large I am thinking of getting 96 GB ram, 14 core CPU, 30 core GPU which is almost same price. Please check attached image. a fully reproducible open source LLM matching Llama 2 70b (New reddit? Click 3 dots at end of this message) Privated to For example, certain inference optimization techniques will only run on newer and more expensive GPUs. New research shows RLHF heavily reduces LLM For running inference, you don't need to go overkill. If you want maximum performance 1) run Linux (CUDA is faster on Linux) and 2) don't run anything else on the GPU when you're running inference loads. llm, not “we use Apache Spark for this”. q3_k_s, q3_k_m, and q4_k_s (in order of accuracy from lowest to highest) quants for 13b are all still better perplexity than fp16 7b models in the benchmarks I've seen. Increase the inference speed of LLM by using multiple devices. I'd hoped that the changes to the memory hierarchy would unlock better utilization of available bandwidth, but that doesn't seem to be the case I wondered does lmstudio take advantage of the neural engine or just the cpu/gpu The (un)official home of #teampixel Inference is fast and only needs a bit more memory than the model size, while training is slower and needs several times more memory than the model size. Additional Info: I'm searching for a GPU to run my LLM, and I noticed that AMD GPUs have larger VRAM and cost less than NVIDIA models. Its processing of prompts is way way too slow and it generally seems optimized for GPU+CPU hybrid inference. You can now chat with its one-click summaries of websites/YT videos/docs, and bring up an LLM Your personal setups: What laptops or desktops are you using for coding, testing, and general LLM work? Have you found any particular hardware configurations (CPU, RAM, # Introduction I did some tests to see how well LLM inference with tensor parallelism scales up on CPU. Keep in mind that no matter what model you use, CPU is magnitudes slower than GPU and I don't know if any service offers free GPU compute. The general idea was to check whether Delving into the realms of mixed-precision, SmoothQuant, and weight-only quantization unveils promising avenues for enhancing LLM inference speeds on CPUs. Simply crazy. Imho it's currently the best bang for buck solution for LLM perf. 7 GHz, ~$130) in terms of impacting LLM performance? The GPU is like an accelerator for your work. This paper introduces Pie, an Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit: [r/datascienceproject] LLM inference with vLLM and AMD: Achieving LLM inference parity with Nvidia (r/MachineLearning) If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. For some specific data preparation tasks, where you have raw data size for CPU up to around 144MB (size of cache), it will be really faster - you won't be waiting on RAM. 8sec/token I think It will still be slower than even just regular cpu inference. CPU llm inference . Cpu performance doesnt really matter, but this cpu is still plenty fast, especially for the price. To be fair, this is still going to be faster than CPU inferencing only. 5tps at the other end of the non-OOMing spectrum. Maybe the only way to use it would be llama_inference_offload in classic GPTQ to get any usable speed on a model that needs 24gb. For new GPUs on linux, and with more tinkering, 7900 XTs are probably the most cost effective. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit The Apple Silicon Macs are interesting because the unified memory means that you can use very large models with better performance than you'd get in a PC running inference solely on the CPU. On CPU, the mixtral will run fully 4x faster than an equal size full 40-something billion parameter This post is about my hardware setup and how it performs certain LLM tasks. So realistically to use it without taking over your computer I guess 16GB of ram is needed. but also because VLLM fails to compile for cpu only even following their own documentation Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or check it out in the app stores It may be the only chatbot LLM but there are many other LLMs that I've used in my coursework that you can get as PyTorch pretrained models from Huggingface, including GPT variants (though not the state of the art models). What's the most performant way to use my hardware? When your LLM does not fit the available VRAM (you mention 12 GB which sounds fairly low depending on model size and quant), the M3 Macs can get you significantly faster inference than CPU-offloading on a PC due to its much higher memory bandwidth. 7B models and up make the rest of the system grind to a halt when doing CPU inference. It is, therefore, a significant challenge to reduce the latency of A few months ago I got a 5b param LLM (one of the defaults from FastChat, iirc it had an M in the title) running on a Jetson Xavier (there's some breaking change Nvidia made between Orin and everything preceding it, I think it's related to the Ubuntu 18. With a single such CPU (4 lanes of DDR4-2400) your memory speed limits inference speed to 1. Start the test with setting only a single thread Since it seems to be targeted towards optimizing it to run on one specific class of CPUs, "Intel Xeon Scalable processors, especially 4th Gen Sapphire Rapids. A 4x3090 server with 142 GB of system RAM and 18 CPU cores costs $1. Right now I am using the 3090 which has the same or similar inference speed as the A100. I upgraded to 64 GB RAM, so with koboldcpp for CPU-based inference and GPU acceleration, I can run LLaMA 65B slowly and 33B fast enough. cpp-based programs such as LM Studio to Posted by u/Fun_Tangerine_1086 - 25 votes and 9 comments Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. -kv f16 is the fastest here, but uses the most memory, so play with it to get the best results. Also increasing parameter n_threads_batch improves performance but both improvement curves It supports a ton of local LLM implementations, and is open source & free :D. An 8-core Zen2 CPU with 8-channel DDR4 will perform nearly twice as fast as 16-core Zen4 CPU with dual-channel DDR5. You will more probably run into space problems and have to get creative to fit monstrous cards like the 3090 or 4090 into a desktop case. 11 seconds (25. I'm currently using mistral-7B-instruct to generate NPC responses in response to event prompts "The player picked up an apple", "the player entered a cave", etc. The big surprise here was that the quantized models are actually fast enough for CPU inference! And even though they're not as fast as GPU, you can easily get 100-200ms/token on a high-end CPU with this, which is amazing. I’m in the market for a new laptop - my 2015 personal MBA has finally given up the ghost. If you get an Intel CPU and GPU, you can just use oneAPI and it will distribute the workload wherever it's faster with Intel AVX-512 VNNI and Intel XMX. MLC LLM looks like an easy option to use my AMD GPU. If the GPU is not fully utilized, it might indicate that the CPU or Here's some quick numbers on a 13B llama model with exllama on a 3060 12GB in Linux: Output generated in 10. LM Studio allows you to pick whether to run the model using CPU and RAM or using GPU and VRAM. only give you 48x2 = 96GB VRAM. Rams frequencies are the most important for llm token generation, as these are often the bottleneck. 93 tokens/s, 256 tokens, context 15, seed 545675865) Output generated in 10. So I'm going to guess that unless NPU has dedicated memory that can provide massive bandwidth like GPU's GDDR VRAM, NPUs usefulness for running LLM entirely on it is quite limited. A common solution is to spill over to CPU memory; however, traditional GPU-CPU memory swapping often results in higher latency and lower throughput. Yet, I'm struggling to put together a reasonable hardware spec. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; vLLM is an open-source LLM inference and serving library that accelerates HuggingFace Transformers by 24x and powers Vicuna and Chatbot Arena. Hello all! Newb here, seeking some advice. By modifying the CPU affinity using Task Manager or third-party software like Lasso Processor, you can set lama. cpp, HuggingFace, LangChain, LlamaIndex, DeepSpeed CPU - Get one with an igpu. Techniques / options to split model inference across multiple LINUX LAN computers (each with CPU&GPU)? Question | Help Because of the serial nature of LLM prediction, this won't yield any end-to-end speed-ups, but it will let you run larger models than would otherwise fit into RAM on a single machine. (Info / ^Contact) GPU inference on M2 is already a thing. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; that LLM runs on CPU only, and CPU can use 16Gb of RAM. Extensive LLama. Every night Posted by u/TheStartupChime - 1 vote and no comments I use opencl on my devices without a dedicated GPU and CPU + OpenCL even on a slightly older Intel iGPU gives a big speed up over CPU only. my question is: how are y'all thinking about inference-specific chips/hardware? or is using standard CPU/GPU inference for edge or local inference good enough? Are any of you working on any open source projects that can run an LLM on a cluster of machines? on multiple machines is sort of the opposite direction everyone is trying to go on i. And once you have a compressed model, you can optimize inference using TensorRT and/or other compilers/kernel libraries. Starting with v6. cpp) offers a setting for selecting the number of layers that can be Local LLM inference on laptop with 14th gen intel cpu and 8GB 4060 GPU . 0 today and it has support for multiple user accounts, so I am going in that direction of being able to handle a large number of concurrent Note: posting on behalf of a friend who doesn't have reddit Wants to try LLM (finetune then inference) with max data privacy, okay with slow speed for inference upto few minutes (not okay with hours) but preferably avoid OOM errors. g. Threadripper 1950X system has 4 modules of 16GB 2400 DDR4 RAM on Asrock X399M Taichi motherboard. 35 seconds (24. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; rtx 3050 8gb. but had very much assumed iGPU inference would still be faster than cpu inference Reply reply (New reddit? Click 3 dots at end of this message I am trying to build a PC primarily for LLM (large language model) inference for my personal projects. , prompt ingestion, perplexity computation), there isn't an efficient GPU implementation yet, so the execution falls back to the CPU / Apple Neural Engine (ANE). Wish somebody could tell me. Or check it out in the app stores Increase the inference speed of LLM by using multiple devices. For example, for highly scalable and low-latency deployment, you'd probably want to do model compression. The idea is to provide a baseline for how a similar platform might operate. and in the day it inferences. The CPU works at about 60%, one of the GPUs runs at around 90-100%, and the other one at around 80%. Hoping will be even more valuable if/when nvidias tensorRT-LLM framework Personally, if I were going for Apple Silicon, I'd go w/ a Mac Studio as an inference device since it has the same compute as the Pro and w/o GPU support, PCIe slots basically useless for an AI machine , however, the 2 x 4090s he has already can already inference quanitizes of the best publicly available models atm faster than a Mac can, and be Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I recently hit 40 GB usage with just 2 safari windows open with a couple of tabs (reddit, YouTube, desktop wallpaper engine). cpp GPU offloading on my Ryzen machine with a more modern motherboard, but it slows down the inference by a huge margin. LLMs are awesome, but the current hype leads people to get tunnel vision. If there was a way to optimize that, it would count for everything. Or check it out in the app stores Enable ZRAM to speed up LLM inference, especially if you're using CPU (like me) Tutorial | Guide Verify if it's enabled (eg. It allows to run . I've been running this for a few weeks on my Arc A770 16GB and it does seem to perform text generation quite a bit faster than Vulkan via llama. I guess it can also play PC games with VM + GPU acceleration. I am sure everyone knows how GPU performance/CUDA amount/VRAM amount affect inference speed, especially in TF/GPTQ/AWQ, but how about CPU? How are cores and frequency could affect LLM inferencing? CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core, 3600 MhzRAM: 32 GB GPUs: (a distributed LLM), inference took me around 30s for a single prompt on a 8GB VRAM gpu, but not bad! /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. I released v0. With some (or a lot) of work, you can run cpu inference with llama. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; you can run them off your CPU alone. Am trying to build a custom PC for LLM inferencing and experiments, and confused with the choice of amd or Intel cpus, primarily am trying to run the llms of a gpu but need to make my build robust so that in worst case or due to some or the other reason There have been many LLM inference solutions since the bloom of open-source LLMs. It's really important for me to run LLM locally in windows having without any serious problems that i can't solve it. Anything less I don't Tensor Cores are especially beneficial when dealing with mixed-precision training, but they can also speed up inference in some cases. 1 or 2 used p40s or even older m40s is the cheapest way to go for inference. Running LLM on CPU-based system. 16GB of VRAM for under $300. Hope it translates to offloading as well making the CPU buffer faster alongside gpu buffer. LLM regression and more. - AMD has all the ingredients to build the future of ubiquitous LLM machines: Imagine devices with low power requirements, like edge devices or laptops, built with the most advanced CDNA3 GPU blocks or AMD Zen 4 CPU blocks. It uses the IGP instead of the CPU cores, and the autotuning backend they use is like black magic. 11 upvotes · comments Compared to the 64GB version, the 128GB version just allows several additional LLM models with parameters of 30B FP16, 70B Q6-Q8, and 180B Q3 to fully utilize the GPU on a Macbook Pro. Or check it out in the app stores LLM inference on CPU :/ I have a finetuned model. Truffle-1 - a $1299 inference computer that can run Mixtral 22 tokens/s preorder. cpp binaries. On an old Microsoft surface, or on my Pixel 6, OpenCL + CPU inference gives me best results. You can get a very good estimate simply by measuring your memory bandwidth and dividing it by the file size of the model you're trying to run. Same issue as trying to CPU inference across two CPUs. I Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. It's a work in progress and has limitations. LM Studio (a wrapper around llama. cpp in jupyter notebook, the easiest way is by using the llama-cpp-python library which is just python bindings of the llama. I haven’t seen any numbers for inference speed with large 60b+ models though. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I love it. While I've read all sorts of bits of information, I haven't stumbled across anything specific about CPU fine tuning times. Using the GPU, it's only a little faster than using the CPU. 1 70B taking up 42. Running parts on high temp for a long time is what damages the parts permanently. This is why even old systems (think x99 or 299) work perfectly well for inference - the GPU is what matters. If you have turbo turned off on an Intel CPU that also takes about 20% of your speed away. You'll also need to have a cpu with integrated graphics to boot or another gpu. 0 or v0. Given my specs, do you think I would try GPU or CPU inference for best results? Please suggest any good models I can try out with this specs. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; Run 70B LLM Inference on a Single 4GB GPU with Our New Open Source Technology Is it possible for a PC to power on with a CPU that isn't supported by the current BIOS? I'm troubleshooting loss of video signal, followed by a restart The following phase for generation of remaining tokens runs on CPU, and this phase is bottlenecked by memory bandwidth rather than compute. CPU has lots of ram capacity but not much speed. However it was a bit of work to implement. I published a simple plot showing The important feature for LLM inference is memory bandwidth, and iGPUs usually have the same memory bandwidth than the GPU, that's why it's usually as fast, or slower than CPU-only inference. and much higher when layers are loaded into the GPUs (dual RTX 4090). KoboldCpp - Combining all the various ggml. Also great for Blender and video For summarization, I actually wrote a REST API that uses only CPU (tested on AVX2) to summarize quite large text very accurately without an LLM and only bart models. Also, smaller models are usually less capable but faster. ). cpp or any framework that uses it as backend. (i mean like solve it with drivers update and etc. 32 tokens/s, 256 tokens, context 15, seed 1844401441) Output generated in 10. a xeon x99 Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Include system information: CPU, OS/version, if GPU, GPU/compute driver version - for certain inference frameworks, CPU speed has a huge impact If you're using llama. For running LLMs, it's advisable to have a multi-core processor with high clock speeds to handle data preprocessing, I/O operations, and parallel computations. It might also mean that, using CPU inference won't be as slow for a MoE model like that. ) to at least 4x Even if you use your GPU and CPU 24/7 it shouldn't cause any damage to them as long as your temp levels stay within safe zone. It currently is limited to FP16, no quant support yet. For tasks involving Matrix x Matrix computations (e. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; probably even using the same compute facilities for their high freq trading and LLM inference. Also, I see many people don't mention that, but CPU inference depends on CPU itself too. llama-cpp has a ton of downsides on not Apple hardware. when your LLM model won't fit in GPU you can side load it to CPU. My understanding is that the GPU to CPU to RAM and back bus gets overwhelmed and chokes. ". cpp and a ggml version. I see difference depending on amount of threads I'm using. (Well, from running LLM point of view). Or check it out in the app stores intel-analytics/ipex-llm: LLM inference and finetuning (LLaMA, Mistral, ChatGLM, Qwen, Baichuan, Mixtral, Gemma) on Intel CPU, iGPU, discrete GPU. txtai supports any LLM available on the Hugging Face Hub. So if you have a 192GB mac studio budget, then you are also in the ballpark of any of the large-bandwidth servers (e. ⚡ Fast inference on CPU and GPU 🤗 Support of the major LLM models 🔧 Easy to setup, call with a single line code 💰 Free to use for both personal and commercial purposes How to. So, for every 40 GB/s of RAM bandwidth your CPU has, you get 1 token per second. Sort of like how inference is slower - but even moreso because it's not just memory bandwidth that we're contending with. " The most interesting thing for me is that it claims initial support for Intel GPUs. For instance, I have hardware that has about 30 GB/s memory bandwidth. I ended up implementing a system to swap them out of the GPU so only one was loaded into VRAM at a time. The only PCs that can compete with that for CPU inference are modern servers with a lot more than 2 memory channels. If those don't work, upgrade your CPU as could be a bottleneck as well. . Central Processing Unit (CPU) While GPUs are crucial for LLM training and inference, the CPU also plays an important role in managing the overall system performance. That's why I've created the awesome-local-llms Posted by u/sbs1799 - 15 votes and 4 comments LLM inference in 3 lines of code. Bigger The integrated GPU-CPU thing (if I think I understand what you're asking), wont make a huge difference with AI. This exploration not only challenges the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 04 EOL) at a reasonable speed. cpp supports working distributed inference now. An AMD 7900xtx at $1k could deliver 80-85% performance of RTX 4090 at $1. Apple needs to develop MLX further for it to be a true option. About and have accesse to alot more horsepower. RadixAttention and It basically splits the workload between CPU + ram and GPU + vram, the performance is not great but still better than multi-node inference. you can also conduct The big issue is that the layers running on the CPU are slow, and if the main goal of this is to take advantage of the RAM in server, then that implies that most of your layers are going to be running on the CPU and therefore the whole things is going to run ~the speed of the CPU. You will probably put more stress on your PC while gaming since during AI inference your typing times and so on gives your PC time to Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. ML compilation (MLC) techniques makes it possible to run LLM inference performantly. GPT4All allows for inference using Apple Metal, which on my M1 Mac mini doubles the inference speed. Sort by: Run 70B LLM Inference on a Single 4GB GPU with Our New Open Source Technology The comprehensive exploration of model quantization techniques punctuates the broader narrative of CPU capabilities in handling LLM inference tasks. I don't think there is a better value for a new GPU for LLM inference than the A770. yes, I use an m40, p40 would be better, for inference its fine, get a fan and shroud off ebay for cooling, and it'll stay cooler plus you can run 24/7, don't pan on finetuning though. So, hands down, the cheapest method is using CPU inference with Llama. In the meantime, with the high demand for compute availability, it is useful to bring support to a broader class of hardware accelerators. Share Add a Comment. I have 330gb system memory so the model fits. AMD and intel are integrating inference focused chips into their CPU/APU packages. ROCm doesn't even allow you to do that. Tiny models, on the other hand, yielded unsatisfactory results. Are there any good breakdowns for running purely on CPU vs GPU? Do RAM requirements vary wildly if you're running CUDA accelerated vs CPU? I'd like to be able to run full FP16 instead of the 4 We are excited to share a new chapter of the WebLLM project, the WebLLM engine: a high-performance in-browser LLM inference engine. Or check it out in the app stores using cpu inference so far. 2xlarge instance with 32 GB of RAM and 8 vCPUs (which cost around US$ 0. CPU and GPU memory will be the most limiting factors aside from processing speed. This assumes you have enough compute to be memory bound - in my tests Q2K-Q5K are fine but those new IQ2 and IQ3 kernels are more complex so budget a 2x performance reduction with those. latency and b) transmission - SGLang is a next-generation interface and runtime for LLM inference, designed to improve execution and programming efficiency. Apple CPU is a bit faster with 8/s on m2 ultra. If so, did you try running 30B/65B models with and without enabled AVX512? What was performance like (tokens/second)? I am curious because it might be a feature that could make Zen 4 beat Raptor Lake (Intel) CPUs in the context of LLM inference. This software enables the high-performance operation of AMD GPUs for computationally-oriented tasks in I have the 7b 4bit alpaca. I think some of you Most compatible option. Here's what it came up with: --- A marvelous beast, so sleek and swift, I can also run a beefy llm, stable diffusion, tts, and stt models simultaneously while increasing content length. Both the GPU and CPU use the same RAM which is Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. The 32g-actorder model is only 10% larger but its the 10% that counts in my experience: 4-bit, with Act Two weeks ago, we released Dolly, a large language model (LLM) trained for less than $30 to exhibit ChatGPT-like human interactivity (aka instruction-following). The LLMs you can squeeze in to inference (34Bs) are just difficult to train with any quality. That will definitely kill performance. Be the first to For NPU, check if it supports LLM workloads and use it. and there's a 2 second starting delay before generation when feeding it a prompt in ooba. This works pretty well, and after switching (2-3 seconds), the responses are at proper GPU inference speeds. Or you can run in both GPU /CPU for middle of the road performance. txtai has been built from the beginning with a focus on local models. Reply reply More replies. TensorRT-LLM is the fastest Inference engine, followed by vLLM& TGI (for CPU-based LLM inference is bottlenecked with memory bandwidth really hard. Or check it out in the app stores LLM inference on CPU :-/ I have a finetuned model. And many things are coming up. 8sec/token upvotes · comments CPU – AMD 5800X3D w/ 32GB RAM GPU – AMD 6800 XT w/ 16GB VRAM Serge made it really easy for me to get started, but it’s all CPU-based. This approach isn The shaders focus mainly on qMatrix x Vector multiplication, which is typically needed for text generation with LLM. cpp) then yes, more RAM bandwidth will increase the inference speed To see how much it impacts the inference speeds you can go to the BIOS and set your memory to 3200 MT/s (the default of most DDR4 dual-channel systems, I think) and see that inference speed will be much slower than running Try different numbers of threads, each processor has its best. Or check it out in the app stores PC Build for LLM CPU Inference with Option for Future Dual RTX thirty-ninety Support One of the new AMD Ryzen 9000 series (or would the 7000 series be enough?), likely a mid-tier model since the CPU inference will be bottlenecked by the RAM's Hi, We're doing LLM these days, like everyone it seems, and I'm building some workstations for software and prompt engineers to increase productivity; yes, cloud resources exist, but a box under the desk is very hard to beat for fast iterations; read a new Arxiv pre-print about a chain-of-thoughts variant and hack together a quick prototype in Python, etc. All I want is to load the model and inference on CPU. You can run this on most hardware Finally, Private LLM is a universal app, so there's also an iOS version of the app. ) For CPU inference you'll want rwkv. I use 6400 ram + 7800x3d + 4070tiS combo, an cpu bottlecks inference, it feels like using 7900x-7950x would increase inference speed at least 10-20 percent How can supporting only a few LLM inferences be an option? Do you only use LLaMA, LLaMA2 and Mistral and Mixtral for inference? MLX is just getting started. It has no GPU (or at least not any useful for LLM work) but as a dual E5-2660v3 (total of eight DDR4 memory channels, twenty physical cores, forty threads) it does okay working from CPU -- not fast, but not I recently was working on getting decent CPU inference speeds too. 0, the first open source, instruction-following LLM, fine-tuned on a human-generated instruction dataset licensed for research and commercial use. Or check it out in the app stores Server Build for LLM CPU Inference with Option for Future Dual RTX 3090 Upgrade One of the new AMD Ryzen 9000 series (or would the 7000 series be enough?), likely a mid-tier model since the CPU inference will be bottlenecked by the RAM's Hi I have a dual 3090 machine with 5950x and 128gb ram 1500w PSU built before I got interested in running LLM. The 4600g is a few bucks cheaper than the 3600. Or check it out in the app stores llm: a Rust crate/CLI for CPU inference of LLMs, including LLaMA, GPT-NeoX, GPT-J and more . Because being ignorant in public doesn’t scare me, I was hoping for cat *. cpp (a lightweight and fast solution to running 4bit For a while I was using a Thinkpad T560 for llama-7B inference, before I made room on one of my T7910 for serious LLM-dorkery. Free 1080 GPU, what MB and CPU should I get? upvote A helpful commenter on github (xNul) says "you're trying to run a 4bit GPTQ model in CPU mode, but GPTQ only exists in GPU mode. My goal is to achieve decent inference speed and handle popular models like Llama3 medium and Phi3 which possibility of expansion. Lower inference quality than other options. Inference is limited by network bandwidth. GGUF with CPU and GPU inference never ever really worked long on my rig. 0cc4m has more numbers. It's too slow and causes stuttering - which is kinda weird. My CPU is 8 cores, but it does not matter if I use 3 or 8 cores, the inference speed is the same. Probably it caps out using somewhere around 6-8 of its 22 cores because it lacks memory bandwidth (in other words, upgrading the cpu, unless you have a cheap 2 or 4 core xeon in there now, is of little use). If I had to put together a PC purely for GPU inference (7b models), what's the cheapest setup I can have? Cheapest = both in terms of purchase cost and power utilization. I hope we'll be getting ASICs sooner than later, they will revolutionise the open-source LLM space. I personally find having an integrated GPU on the CPU pretty vital for troubleshooting mostly. But anyway the problem is that for bigger models the size doubling will be to much to bear at some point. Our work, LongLM/Self-Extend — which has also received some exposure on Twitter/X and Reddit — can extend the context window of RoPE-based LLMs (Llama, Mistral, Phi, etc. This isn’t a LLM specific tip, this is akin to saying “Make sure if you have an 8 core cpu you’re using all 8 cores” If you are doing CPU+RAM inference, it wouldn't matter at all. My CPU supports 2 channels, so i can multiply it by to: 25 600 x 2 = 51 200 Bytes per second. When I tried running the same model in PyTorch on Windows, for some reason performance was much worse and it took 500ms. Today, we’re releasing Dolly 2. Same for diffusion, GPU fast, CPU slow. cpp, use llama-bench for the results - this solves multiple problems. But considering those limitations, it works pretty well. Large model is hard to run on personal computer as its requirement on GPU/CPU ram, not even to fast inference. In short, InferLLM is a simple and efficient LLM CPU inference framework that can deploy quantized models in LLM locally and has good inference speed. 46 per hour), it took a lot of time to make a single inference (around 2 min). For 7B Q4 models, I get a token generation speed of around 3 tokens/sec, but the prompt processing takes forever. 800 on the M2 Ultra). (If the LLM size exceeds the Mac’s VRAM, would it only run on CPU with a painfully slow speed? I’m still not quite sure. Maybe the recently open sourced hugging face inference engine does a better job though. The lack of fp16 really hurts. : I'm on a laptop with just 8 GB VRAM so I need a LLM that works with that. 4. But if you are getting a Mac, you might as well use the GPU and double your speed. Inference speed is Right now I'm using runpod, colab or inference APIs for GPU inference. Sometimes closer to $200. I have tried different numbers of CPU threads, with minimal impact on inference speed. Mind as well rent a cloud A100 to do it properly. If you are running inference on GPU, this could help somewhat but I wouldn't expect much as most of the heavy lifting is done on the GPU itself I've learnt loads from this community about running open-weight LLMs locally, and I understand how overwhelming it can be to navigate this landscape of open-source LLM inference tools. 6k, and 94% of RTX 3900Ti previously at $2k. Other then time to do the inference would there be any impact in terms of results? If your goal is to do CPU inference, your best bet is to get a Mac. A significant shift has been observed in research objectives and methodologies toward an LLM-centric approach. 5GBs. I was able to procure a second-hand RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra graphics card from a friend at a very reasonable price. and it has been instructed to provided 1-sentence-long responses only but it still takes like a minute to generate the text. Or check it out in the app stores maybe that's something to look at for cpu inference. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; First timer building a new (to me) rig for LLM inference, fine-tuning, etc. In different quantized method, TF/GPTQ/AWQ are relying on GPU, and GGUF/GGML is using CPU+GPU, offloading part of work to GPU. Standardizing on prompt length (which again, has a big effect on performance), and the #1 problem with all the View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. I tried to use llama. After training a ShuffleNetV2 based model on Linux, I got CPU inference speeds of less than 20ms per frame in PyTorch. Deepspeed or Hugging Face can spread it out between GPU and CPU, but even so, it will be stupid slow, probably MINUTES per token. epyc genoa does something like 460GB/s per CPU socket vs. We want an igpu because cards like the P40 don't have video output, like you mentioned. Save some money unless you need a many core cpu for other things. This project was just recently renamed from BigDL-LLM to IPEX-LLM. On llamacpp, I have experimented with n_threads which seems to be ideal at nb. However, when I tried running it on an AWS ml. I want to now buy a better machine which can allow me to do inference on 7B or 13B models at a faster gguff is not optimized for raw speed, much more of a compatibility format and few trick pony like running split on GPU and CPU. I asked it to write a sonnet extolling the virtues of the Dolphin-Mistral-7b model. Inference speed is basically the function of the memory subsystem. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; then it at least has the potential to run CPU-based inference at speeds that would compare to a 4090. One more thing. ESP32 is a series of low cost, low power system on a chip microcontrollers with integrated Wi-Fi and dual-mode Bluetooth. Since prompt processing uses PCIe bandwidth I think the bottleneck is having cards spread across two CPUs. Budget: Around $1,500 Requirements: GPU capable of handling LLMs efficiently. I want to do inference, data preparation, train local LLMs for learning purposes. I do inference on CPU too and it seems it's limited by RAM bandwidth for sure. A 6 billion parameter LLM stores weight in float16, so that requires 12Gb of RAM just for weights. So if you have trouble with 13b model inference, try running those on koboldcpp with some of the model on CPU, and as much as possible on GPU. A PyTorch LLM library that seamlessly integrates with llama. What would be good target amounts of system RAM and vRAM for compiling 13B models to vulkan MLC LLM format? Does inference itself run on a mixture of CPU/GPU (ie can both RAM/vRAM contribute or does it need to run primarily on GPU)? I do not currently have batch inference implemented for any of the LLM backends but have been actively thinking about that problem and I would expect it to be resolved by v0. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; I wasn't aware these 16 Gigs + CPU could be used until it was pointed out in the comment by @PreparationFlimsy848 Thanks. cpp CPU LLM inference projects with a WebUI and API (formerly llamacpp-for-kobold) Other Some time back I created llamacpp-for-kobold , a lightweight program that combines KoboldAI (a full featured text writing client for autoregressive LLMs) with llama. Good inference speed in AutoGPTQ and GPTQ-for-LLaMa. The cards on either CPU will hand to communicate through the CPUs’ slow QPI link between the two CPUs. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of It is really the most cost effective method for realtime LLM use. In the current landscape of AI applications, running LLMs locally on CPU has become an attractive option for many developers and organizations. edit: saw this comment there sadly: This PR will not speed up Hi there, I ended up went with single node multi-GPU setup 3xL40. 😊 this is my Yeah its way slower. This is an unreleased feature (should be release in the next couple of days). Now it's time to let Leon has his own identity. But the reference implementation had a hard requirement on having CUDA so I couldn't run it on my Apple Silicon Macbook. We quantize them to 2bit in a finetuning-free + plug-and-play fashion. cpp Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. run on a single small GPU/CPU without splitting that requires massive amounts of communication to proceed to the next step, communication that is unnecessary A streamlined and user-friendly library designed for performing local LLM inference directly through your preferred programming language. I am now building machine for AI and will put there 7950X3D, it's better than without 3D cache CPU and AMDs really have better performance than i9-13900K. I have been using Runpod for all of this, including the CPU and RAM, and so far, with the 13b and 33b models, the inference time matches what I have seen others achieving. A byproduct of that is that AS Macs that people bought for other purposes can provide good performance on relatively large models (for example, my 32GB Proceed with a voice recognition Assistant Toy Project based on LLM, including STT / TTS And vaguely thought that training would anyway need to be done in the cloud. With a 32 or more-core Epyc 7003 cpu in octa channel (DDR4 3200), you can expect 3 to 4 tokens(70b) equivalent to a 200GB/S vram of speed. AMD is one potential candidate. If you're doing inference on GPU, which you should lest it be really slow, it doesn't matter. More than 5 cores are actually slower for someone with a 16 core. Feedback I am thinking of getting 96 GB ram, 14 core CPU, 30 core GPU which is almost same price. cpp CPU LLM inference projects with a WebUI and API (formerly llamacpp-for-kobold) Some time back I created llamacpp-for-kobold , a lightweight program that combines KoboldAI (a full featured text writing client for autoregressive LLMs) with llama. The more core/threads your CPU has - the better. I'm setting myself up, little by little, to have a local setup that's for training and inference. I have found Ollama which is great. This frees up a ton of resources because the LLM is a bit of an overkill. cpp and any LiteLLM The ROCm Platform brings a rich foundation to advanced computing by seamlessly integrating the CPU and GPU with the goal of solving real-world problems. Basically just get whatever you need to provide at least 8 PCIe lanes to each GPU you are using. 74 tokens/s, 256 tokens, context 15, seed 91871968) As for TensorRT-LLM I think it is more about effectiveness of tensor cores utilization in LLM inference. cpp benchmark & more speed on CPU, 7b to 30b, Q2_K, to Q6_K and FP16, X3D, DDR-4000 and DDR-6000 that's the rub as I can see - the prompt processing is basically the bottleneck for low end inference on CPU. with full precision activation. Or check it out in the app stores &nbsp; It's not the same as offloading layers to cpu in llamacpp since these layers will be computed by GPU with huge penalty instead of using CPU for RAM directly. If I make a CPU friendly LLM, I could potentially make a small cluster. Last week I used it again for guanaco-7B inference. The key idea of Fiddler is to use the computation ability of the CPU to minimize the data movement between the CPU and GPU I am relatively inexperienced with Pytorch and LLM inference, but I have been reading the documentation with no success to solve this particular problem re multithreaded CPU inference with Microsoft/guidance-ai. 3 this method also supports llama. Join us for game discussions, tips and tricks, and all things OSRS! OSRS is the official legacy version of RuneScape, the largest free-to-play MMORPG. I've tried CPU inference and it's a little too slow for my use cases. Hybrid CPU/GPU Utilization: Integrates the computational abilities of both CPU and GPU for balanced workload and faster processing. Most of the performant inference solutions are based on CUDA and optimized for NVIDIA GPUs nowadays. I’d like to get something capable of running decent LLM inference locally, with a budget around 2500 USD. Currently on a RTX 3070 ti and my CPU is 12th gen i7-12700k 12 core. For this little project, I am planning to do (slow) CPU only inference. Preliminary observations by me for CPU inference: Faster ghz cpu seems more useful than tons of cores. Fine tuning too if possible. cpp (a lightweight and fast solution to running It gets usable speeds even on CPU only inference on 8 bit GGUF quants of Yi-34B, Mixtral, etc. The ESP32 series employs either a Tensilica Xtensa LX6, Xtensa LX7 or a RiscV processor, and both dual-core and single-core variations are available. Would I be better off with an older/used Threadripper or Epyc CPU, or a newer Ryzen? Server/HEDT platforms will give you more PCIe lanes and thus more GPUs. GGUF inference needs only 4-6 threads of today's cpus, going higher doesn't do anything. So until then I want to have my own system that can run some basic inference. plus being designed for data centres, and using an ebay shroud you can run them 24x7 without worrying about over heating/cooling issues. With this new paper, the memory bandwidth (a big bottleneck for CPU inference) looks to be at least partially overcome. 4-bit 65B models are around ~40 gb in size in RAM. So either go for a cheap computer with a lot I'd like to figure out options for running Mixtral 8x7B locally. Because of the cpu inference. Tesla's in-car hardware is inference focused. the difference is tokens per second vs tokens per minute. Yes, it's possible to do it on CPU/RAM (Threadripper builds with > 256GB RAM + some assortment of 2x-4x GPUs), but the speed is so slow that it's pointless working with it. Recently I built an EPYC workstation with a purpose of replacing my old, worn out Threadripper 1950X system. RAM is essential for storing model weights, intermediate results, and other data during inference, but won’t be primary factor affecting LLM performance. Or check it out in the app stores In theory you could build relatively cheap used epyc or xeon systems hitting 128gn ram and more so I was wondering how cpu inference with at least decent ram throughput looks like performance wise. 27 seconds (24. I was thinking of something like: So llama. Flame my choices, recommend me a different way, and any ideas on benchmarking 2x P40 vs 2x P100? CPU: Used Intel Xeon E-2286G 6-core (a real one, not ES/QS/etc) KoboldCpp - Combining all the various ggml. However, this can have a drastic impact on performance. All you need here is bandwidth and inference on single chip, going for more than 1 cpu only splits bandwidth between them and introduces more delays Or you can run entirely in CPU for the worst performance. You can read more about the multi-GPU across GPU brands Vulkan support in this PR. Currently supports CPU and GPU, optimized for Arm, x86, CUDA and riscv-vector. It's mainly for running GEANT4 and ROCStar simulations, but I frequently use one of its five servers for LLM inference or training/tuning. If you assign more threads, you are asking for more bandwidth, but past a certain point you aren't getting it. Or check it out in the app stores PC Build for LLM CPU Inference with Option for Future Dual RTX 3090 Upgrade One of the new AMD Ryzen 9000 series (or would the 7000 series be enough?), likely a mid-tier model since the CPU inference will be bottlenecked by the RAM's To generate a single token, the CPU must read the entire model from RAM. Locked post. It allows to run Llama Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. As we see promising opportunities for running capable models locally, web browsers form a universally accessible platform, allowing users to engage with any web applications without installation. So while you can run a LLM on CPU (many here do), the larger the model the slower it gets. Otherwise I am using CPU. Pop!_OS has it enabled): The only way I can imagine this helping is if you have a bunch of other active processes Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. That's interesting to know. Let’s say it has to be a laptop. I am looking for a GPU with really good inference speed. Trouble is your PC isn't my PC. That means the only specs you actually need are enough pcie lanes, and enough pcie slots, plus a power supply powerful enough to Recently I implemented inference capabilities from an LLM, fully offline. This is awesome, can't wait to try it. The more lanes your mainboard/chipset/cpu support, the faster an LLm inference might start, but once the generation is running, there won't be any noticeable differences. I understand running in CPU mode will be slow, but that's ok. And it can be deployed on mobile phones, with acceptable speed. CPU is shit This costs you a bit of overhead in time too. Thanks! Google's Tensor G2 and coming G3 are inference focused. But that might take a while. drnrpu vobmy ekxhtt ogkl eefde eoajv iuxq nhxne kspbvg hqw